Same slogan, new cable: Why economic development promises keep falling short in Micronesia
- Admin
- 14 minutes ago
- 5 min read
By Joyce McClure
When submarine cables reached the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau and Guam, leaders framed it as an economic turning point. Faster, cheaper internet would spark private-sector growth and exportable digital work.
In Yap, the Pacific Island Times reported in 2021 that a new local carrier, iBoom Waab Inc., would help convert that connectivity into jobs and services. The plan was ambitious: fiber to the home, local technicians and offshore digital contracts that would bring revenue into Yap.
On the infrastructure side, much of that vision came to life. The World Bank’s Digital FSM program reports more connected premises and faster entry-level speeds across Yap, Chuuk and Pohnpei. Prices have fallen as competition and options like Starlink enter the market.
FSM’s Telecommunications Regulator Authority has classified key fiber assets as “bottleneck facilities,” requiring open access for competitors, while FSMTC completed a HANTRU-1 upgrade between Pohnpei and Guam in 2021, strengthening international capacity.
Connectivity and price metrics have improved, but the step from better internet to broad-based employment has not. Four years after PIT profiled Yap’s “little island that could,” there have been no public announcements of major firms awarding Yap-based back-office contracts. The 2025 World Bank progress report tracks policy and service milestones, but not job creation.
The reasons are largely structural. Micronesian islands are small, scattered and expensive to serve. Enterprise clients prize reliability—power redundancy, 24-hour uptime and skilled labor pools that are difficult to sustain on remote islands.
Out-migration and the limited size of local markets keep private employers cautious. The FSM’s own regulator notes that capacity remains concentrated and that open-access rules are necessary to prevent monopoly pricing—signs of a thin, emerging market rather than a fully commercial ecosystem.
In Yap, iBoom’s “Broadband for All – Yap State” project, supported by the Internet Society Foundation and the APNIC Foundation’s ISIF Asia program, has delivered measurable results. The project built a fixed-wireless access network across Yap’s main island, connected over 30 locations by 2022 through fiber backhaul and Gigabit Passive Optical Network, and extended broadband service to schools and clinics.
In October 2023, the Yap State government and iBoom formalized their partnership in a public-private agreement. The infrastructure exists, the regulatory environment is maturing, and local know-how has grown—but the job creation that inspired the project remains modest. iBoom continues as a functioning local internet and infrastructure provider rather than the export-service gateway once envisioned.
Across Micronesia, this pattern is familiar. “Economic development” is the most durable political promise and the least realized. Every election cycle, candidates pledge to expand private enterprise and attract investment.
In the FSM, the call for “economic self-reliance” has appeared in every presidential address since the Compact of Free Association took effect in 1986. Successive administrations have promoted diversification through fisheries, tourism and digital services.
The Strategic Development Plan 2004–2023 set nearly identical goals to those still quoted today.
While infrastructure and connectivity have improved, the government remains the dominant employer, financed largely by compact grants and trust-fund withdrawals.
Palau’s 2021 Medium-Term Development Plan emphasized renewable energy, small-business growth and digital innovation, yet the Asian Development Bank’s 2024 update continues to list tourism and the public sector as the country’s main economic pillars.
Guam’s 2024 Economic Development Authority report shows that the government, the military, and tourism continue to make up the majority of economic activity. The pattern is clear: nearly every candidate campaigns on growth, but structural change is slow to materialize. Small populations, isolation and dependence on external funding keep these economies vulnerable.
Now artificial intelligence is reshaping the global labor market, offering both risk and a potential reset. The kinds of jobs once imagined for Micronesia—data entry, transcription and basic customer service—are among the most automatable.
McKinsey & Company estimates that generative AI could transform or eliminate a large share of routine office-support roles by the mid-2030s. An International Monetary Fund study of the Philippines, a major outsourcing hub, finds that about one-third of workers are highly exposed to AI, with many of their roles shifting toward oversight and quality control rather than replacement.
For Yap, Chuuk or Palau, that means the original “call-center seat” strategy is less viable today. Yet, AI can also open new niches where humans still matter: supervising automated systems, labeling data for training models, producing tourism content or managing local environmental datasets.
Research on AI annotation work in Africa and Southeast Asia shows that labeling images, audio and text for machine learning has created income streams in small economies, though often at low margins.
For Micronesia, a higher-value path would combine AI tools with local knowledge: environmental monitoring, fisheries management, tourism marketing and translation services that require cultural context.
A regional survey by the AI Asia Pacific Institute finds that most Pacific island countries are still at the early stage—interested but lacking governance frameworks, digital-skills programs and data-protection laws. The FSM’s situation fits that description: substantial investment in connectivity and access reform, but an early-stage enterprise environment needed for digital exports.
Workers and students preparing for this shift will need to use AI, not compete with it. Employers increasingly seek people who can work alongside digital tools—those who combine technical familiarity with communication, problem-solving and domain knowledge. Short, stackable credentials in IT support, data handling and customer-experience platforms can help build that workforce. Pairing those skills with local strengths, such as marine science, tourism and indigenous languages, creates value that automation cannot replicate.
Governments can accelerate readiness by adopting data-protection and cybersecurity standards consistent with international norms, extending the “enabling environment” created under Digital FSM to cover AI and cloud services.
AI will likely reduce demand for routine offshore tasks while raising demand for hybrid roles that blend automation with human judgment. Islands that invest in reliability, redundancy, clear service-level agreements and trained teams will have a better chance of landing the first anchor contracts that demonstrate feasibility. The alternative, as studies warn, is a race to the bottom in low-paid annotation work.
Micronesia is not starting from zero. The cable backbone is stronger, prices are lower, access is wider and policy has moved toward open networks. The challenge now is to convert that infrastructure into a small but durable stream of AI-enabled services that fit the region’s scale and strengths.
The technology has arrived; the economic model still needs to catch up. Turning those cables into careers will require not just connectivity, but commitment—before the next campaign season recycles the same familiar promises.
Subscribe to
our monthly
digital edition