Guam’s courts aren’t soft; the system is broken

By Joseph Arriola

Let’s stop dancing around it. Every time someone on probation commits another violent crime, every time a repeat offender walks out with yet another chance, every time we see the same mugshot for the tenth time, people jump straight to the easiest explanation: “The courts are too lenient.” It’s the island’s favorite shortcut.

The courts aren’t soft — the whole system is busted. And if we’re being real, people blame the courts because the alternative is uncomfortable: either the system is broken, or the AG’s office isn’t doing its job. Pick whichever one hurts less.

Start with the most obvious disaster: DOC is a mess. The prison was built for around 300 people. We’ve stuffed in more than 800 detainees and inmates combined. That’s not “overcrowded”—that’s a slow‑motion collapse. Judges know that if they keep handing out long sentences, the whole thing will blow.

So, they do what the system corners them into doing: shorter sentences, suspended sentences, probation, deferred pleas. Not because they’re soft.

Because there’s literally nowhere to put anyone. You can’t “get tough” when you’re out of beds and out of space.

Then there’s meth — the real engine behind Guam’s crime problem. Meth isn’t weed. It’s not alcohol. It’s a chemical that hijacks your brain and drags you back into the same chaos repeatedly. And what do we offer people stuck in that cycle? A couple of worksheets. A few meetings. A prayer. No long‑term treatment. No real rehab. No serious infrastructure. Nothing that matches the scale of the problem.

Judges know that locking someone up without treatment just means they’ll come out and do the same thing again. So, they try to push people into programs that barely exist. When those programs fail, the public sees “leniency.” What we’re seeing is a system pretending to treat addiction with duct tape.

And the laws? They’re a mess, too. Guam’s sentencing statutes are stuffed with mandatory probation options, deferred pleas, and “first‑time offender” rules that tie judges’ hands. People think judges can just “throw the book” at someone because the public is angry. They can’t.

The legislature wrote the rules. The courts follow them. If the law says someone qualifies for probation, the judge must consider it. If the law allows a plea deal, the judge can’t magically turn it into a 20‑year sentence.

And here’s another truth people don’t like hearing: when a jury deliberates guilty or not guilty, that’s their call, whether or not you agree with it. You don’t get to blame the judge for a verdict the judge didn’t make.

So, here’s the bottom line: if we want tougher sentences, then amend the law and build another facility to hold the people you want locked up. You can’t demand “throw them in jail” when the jail is already bursting at the seams.

Meanwhile, the courts are drowning. Trials take time, money and manpower— all in short supply. So, plea deals become the default. Reduced charges. Lighter sentences. Quick resolutions. Not because anyone thinks it’s ideal, but because the system is running on fumes.

And when people finally get out? We basically shove them off a cliff. No housing. No job. No support. No treatment. They walk out the gate and straight back into the same environment that broke them. Then they reoffend, and everyone blames the judge. But the failure happened long before the courtroom.

If Guam wants real accountability, we need to stop yelling at the courts and start fixing the system. Build treatment. Modernize sentencing laws. Expand reentry. Increase capacity. Give judges real tools instead of forcing them to choose between bad and worse.

Until then, what looks like “leniency” isn’t softness — it’s the system showing us exactly how broken it is.

Joseph B.D. Arriola is a resident of Dededo

Subscribe to

our digital

monthly issue